6.5.10

she sees red

here's a list of stuff i'm angry about at the moment. i don't presently have time to go into extensive detail (lucky for you poor readers), but i might soon. just you wait.

1. skinny jeans rape acquittals. nicholas gonzales in sydney was acquitted from raping a woman because a juror (NOT even evidence presented as defence) felt that because our victim was wearing skinny jeans, that there must have been some consent as those things don't just come off on their own.

to that juror: fuck off and die in a hole. go back to the barbarism of the 18th century and see how serfdom suits you.

2. deveny getting booted. much has been written about her. i know. and although i am a fan of her stuff (and have followed her column, twitter and books), even i found the rove tweet a bit much. AND i was reading it real time. (unlike much of the judging public). as an aside, i think she could have dealt with the fracas a leetle better.

but fired? are you kidding me?

riddle me this - what do matthew johns, sam newman, bert newton and kyle sandilands all really have in common?

3. oil vomitting out into the ocean in the Gulf of Mexico. oh lord - where to start...
if you're going to do surgery, know how to stop a haemorrhage first.

4. resources capital heads deciding that they might take their bat and ball and go home because they're being charged extra to plum the land. see this

i know that K-Rudd is not this forward-thinking (maybe he was in a previous life, i dunno). but as much as this capital hostage is fucked, i'm also hoping that this is a strange and almost-genius environmental policy based on reverse psychology. tax the fuck out of the bastards, they throw a tantrum. we reduce our carbon emissions and stop desecrating aboriginal land. hooray!


there. done. next time: good news.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

arrrrrr

lauren said...

i can just imagine you doing that with your best cute monster face on too.

arrrr.

MildlyCrafty said...

re point 1: that's unbelievable! wtf is wrong with people?

Rob @ Cynic said...

I was talking about the skinny jean/rape thing to a client and literally went on a 20 minute rant. We all know the law is an ass, but sometimes it can be a fucking retarded ass.

[I know you shouldn't say retarded anymore but 'challenged' just doesn't do it for me]

lauren said...

amy - i don't fuckin' know. as someone else mentioned elsewhere, i'm thinking of moving to antarctica.

rob - see above. and when it comes to this case and the law, you CAN say retarded - it is held back in its development and lags behind LAMF.

honestly, between this and the burqa banning, i am SERIOUSLY angry about women's rights in this country.

Ramona said...

As a mother of a 16 year old who looks fucking awesome in skinny jeans I can honestly say this stuff scares me more than anything. It's all very well for me to teach her that owning her body and where fashion intersects with it can be a joy but I have to temper it with warnings about 'interpretation' - yuck.

lauren said...

ramona - that whole concept of 'interpretation' gets me started on a whole other rant about the image of women (which is where interpretation comes from).

like, if all the images of what a desirable and/or powerful woman looked like was short, flat-chested and all over a brown woollen box pleat skirt, you think skinny jeans would 'say' anything? nawp.

i'm so glad for society that you can have a conversation with the 16-year old that says 'damn you look ace in a pair of skinny jeans' at the same time as having a conversation about 'interpretation'. not many yummy mummies get to have that either.